A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report




Скачать 152.21 Kb.
НазваниеA summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report
страница1/5
Дата конвертации13.04.2013
Размер152.21 Kb.
ТипДокументы
  1   2   3   4   5
Faculty Senate Librarian’s Report, March 22, 2010


A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report.


Academic Standards Committee

Chair: Stuart Tedders (CHHS)


Academic Standards Committee met on January 5, 2010

Present at this meeting were Simone Charles (COPH), Christine Draper (COE), Ardian Greca (CIT), John King (COBA), David Lowder (LIB), Lisa Smith (LIB), Reed Smith (CLASS), Wayne Smith (Registrar’s Office), Stuart Tedders (COPH). Not attending the meeting on January 5th meeting were Wendy Dees (CHHS), Hyo-Joo Han (CIT), Scott Kersey (COST), Teri Melton (COE), Lowell Mooney (COBA), Connie Murphey (Financial Aid), Danette Wood (CHHS).


A total of 240 student appeals were received by the Registrars Office. Of the 240 appeals received, 17 students were less than 10 quality points away from a 2.0 GPA. According to current academic standards committee policy, these students are automatically granted an appeal by the Registrar’s Office. Additional academic standards committee policy states that students earning a 2.0 GPA or better for the previous two semesters are automatically readmitted. For this meeting, 93 appeals met this criterion and appeals for these students were automatically approved. The committee actually reviewed 130 appeals during the January 5th meeting. Only 2 appeals were approved by the academic standards committee. Among those appeals denied by the committee, 71 students submitted appeals to the Dean of their respective college. Among this group, 32 appeals were approved by the Dean of the College and 39 appeals were denied.


Respectfully submitted,


Stuart H. Tedders, PhD

Chair, Academic Standards Committee


Academic Standards Committee met on January 7, 2010

Present at this meeting were Wendy Dees (CHHS), Christine Draper (COE), Ardian Greca (CIT), Scott Kersey (COST), John King (COBA), David Lowder (LIB), Teri Melton (COE), Lowell Mooney (COBA), Lisa Smith (LIB), Reed Smith (CLASS), Wayne Smith (Registrar’s Office), Stuart Tedders (COPH), Danette Wood (CHHS). Not attending the meeting on January 7th meeting were Simone Charles (COPH), Hyo-Joo Han (CIT), Connie Murphey (Financial Aid).


Since the January 5th meeting, a total of 59 additional student appeals were received by the Registrars Office. Of the 59 appeals, 8 students were less than 10 quality points away from a 2.0 GPA so they were automatically granted an appeal by the Registrar’s Office. The committee actually reviewed 50 appeals and only 3 appeals were granted. Among those appeals denied by the committee, 24 students submitted appeals to the Dean of their respective college. Of these subsequent appeals, 11 were approved by the Dean of the College and 13 students were denied.


Respectfully submitted,


Stuart H. Tedders, PhD

Chair, Academic Standards Committee


Elections Committee

Chair: Patricia Humphrey, Senate Librarian (COST)


Faculty Development Committee

Chair: Fred Smith (LIB)


Faculty Research Committee

Chair: Caren Town (CLASS)

Georgia Southern University Faculty Research Committee

January 26, 2010 – 12:00 Noon




Minutes





  1. The Faculty Research Committee was called to order at 12:00 Noon on January 26, 2010 by the Committee Chair, Dr. Caren Town.




  1. The committee voted to approve the agenda as read

    1. Motion: Elaine Marshall

    2. Second: Jackie Eastman




  1. The committee voted to approve the minutes of the 1-26-2010 meeting as read

    1. Motion: Elaine Marshall

    2. Second: Jackie Eastman




  1. Roll Call

    1. Present

      1. Caren Town – CLASS

      2. Elaine Marshall – CHHS

      3. James Harris – CIT

      4. Jackie Eastman - COBA

      5. Sophie George – COST

      6. Robert Vogel – JPHCOPH

      7. Bob Fernekes – Library

      8. Ele Haynes – ORSSP

      9. Teri Melton - COE

    2. Absent

      1. Charles Patterson, AVP Research




  1. Fourteen completed applications were submitted to ORSSP by the 5 PM deadline on November 30. Committee members were assigned 2 candidates each to fully review and present to the committee. Presentations focused on assets and were not evaluative in nature.




    1. Committee members provided a summary and asset review of their assigned candidates.

    2. Following all 14 reports, the committee assessed the comparative submissions and independently separated the candidate pool into two groups.

    3. The committee members unanimously voted to move 7 applicants forward to the next round of evaluation.

    4. Review packets will be maintained in the ORSSP office room 2023, accessed through 2021 and will be available between 8AM and 5 PM, Monday through Friday. Committee members will make an effort to come to the office to fully evaluate the 7 group 1 candidates.

    5. Applications will also be set up in the meeting room at 11:00 on Thursday, January 28, 2010 for committee review and evaluation.

    6. The committee will be prepared to discuss all 7 applications with the intent to identify 2 recipients using the consensus method.




  1. Calendaring of meetings –

    1. The committee will reconvene on January 28, 2010 at 12:00 noon to narrow the second round applications for the Excellence in Research and Scholarship Award candidates.

      1. January 28 - 12-1 PM (Excellence Selection)




    1. Committee members will set the grant award meeting dates at the January 28 meeting.




  1. Adjourn 1:15 PM



  1   2   3   4   5

Добавить в свой блог или на сайт

Похожие:

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconA summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconThe main objectives of this Report, consisting of the executive summary, the extended summary and the full report, are

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconUniversity Faculty Senate Bulletin

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconUniversity faculty senate bulletin

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconUniversity Information Technology Committee Meeting Faculty Senate Chambers, dh hill Library September 8, 2010

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconFaculty of Health Sciences Research Report 2006 Department of Anaesthesia Research Report 2006

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconExecutive Summary of Report on

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconFaculty of the Professions Adelaide Graduate School of Business

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconFaculty of the Professions Adelaide Graduate School of Business

A summary of business conducted by the Faculty Senate committees since the last Librarian’s Report iconUniversity of Debrecen, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration


Разместите кнопку на своём сайте:
lib.convdocs.org


База данных защищена авторским правом ©lib.convdocs.org 2012
обратиться к администрации
lib.convdocs.org
Главная страница