A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2




НазваниеA2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2
страница1/108
Дата конвертации19.04.2013
Размер0.88 Mb.
ТипДокументы
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   108

Gonzaga Debate Institute 2010

Collaboration Aff A2 CPs

Aff Answers to Counterplans

Aff Answers to Counterplans 1

A2 Afghanistan Corruption CP 2

Non-Unique 3

Non-Unique 4

Non-Unique 5

A2 – Corruption 6

A2 – Corruption 6

A2 – Terrorism 8

A2 – Reform Solvency 8

A2 – Reform Solvency 10

A2 – Terrorism 11

A2 – Terrorism 12

A2 – Pakistan (Impact turn) 13

A2 – Reform Solvency 14

Impact – Taliban 15

A2 Consult JCS CP 16

Say No 17

Say No 18

Say No  Link to Politics 19

Perm Solvency 20

Binding Consultation  Less Effective 22

Binding Consultation  Less Effective 23

A2 Consult Nato CP 24

Lie Perm Card 25

Consult Bad Theory 26

NATO Weak Now 27

NATO Weak Now 28

NATO Weak Now 29

NATO Weak Now 30

Say No – Afghanistan 31

Say No – Afghanistan 32

Say No – Kuwait 34

Link Turn – Rising Expectations 35

Link Defense – No Spillover 36

Solvency Deficit – Delay 37

Consultation Non-Unique 38

NATO Weak on Terrorism 39

NATO Weak on Terrorism 41

NATO Weak on Terrorism 42

NATO Weak on Terrorism 43

NATO Weak in Afghanistan 44

NATO Weak in Iraq 46

NATO Fails – Generic 48

NATO Fails at Peacekeeping 49

NATO Bad – Hegemony 50

NATO Bad – China 51

NATO Bad – Arms Sales 52

A2 Courts CP 53

Courts don’t solve – lower courts 54

Courts don’t solve foreign policy 55

Courts link to politics 56

Only Congress/Prez Solve Foreign Policy 57

Only Congress/Prez Solve Foreign Policy 58

Prez Solves Foreign Policy 59

Prez Solves Foreign Policy 60

Prez Solves Foreign Policy 61

Prez Solves Foreign Policy 63

Prez Solves - Middle East 64

Prez Solves – Military 65

Prez Solves – Arms Sales 66

Deference Good – Threat Response 67

Deference Good – Readiness 68

Deference Good – Readiness 69

Deference Good – Readiness 70

Deference Good – Readiness 71

Deference Good – Terrorism 72

Deference Good – Separation of Powers 73

Deference Good – Pres Powers 74

Deference Good – AT: CMR 75

Separation of Powers Turn 76

Separation of Powers ext. 78

Activism/Legitimacy Turn 79

Activism/Legitimacy Links 81

CIL Can’t Solve – Vague 82

CIL Can’t solve – Vague 83

CIL Can’t Solve – No enforcement 84

CIL Can’t Solve – No Spillover 85

CIL Bad – AT: Environment 86

CIL Bad – AT: Satellites (Koplow) 87

CIL Bad - Undemocratic 88

CIL Bad - Undemocratic 90

A2 Executive Order CP 91

Courts will rollback 92

Future Presidents Rollback 93

Presidential Powers –Non Unique 94

Presidential Powers kill SOP (DA) 1/2 95

Presidential Powers kill SOP (DA) 2/2 96

IBC turn 1/2 98

IBC turn 2/2 99

Politics links to the CP 100

Take years 101

Congress Checks 102

XO hurt democracy 103

Congress will Rollback 105

A2 Iraq Conditions CP 107

Says No 108

Appeasement 109

AIPAC DA 110

AIPAC DA 112

A2 Japan QPQ CP 113

Arms Race T/ 114

Japan-China Alliance Good – 2AC 115

Japan-China Alliance Good – 2AC 116

Japan-China Alliance Good – 2AC 117

Japan-China Alliance Good – 1AR Asian Stability XT 118

Japan-China Alliance Good – 1AR Asian Stability XT 119

Japan-China Alliance Good – 1AR Asian Stability XT 120

Japan-China Alliance Good – 1AR Econ XT 121

Japan-China Alliance Good – 1AR Econ XT 122

Japan Says No 123

Japan Says No 125

Japan Says No 127

Japan Says No 129

No NB – US-Japan Relations High 130

No NB – Japan Wouldn’t Side with China 131

No NB – Japan Wouldn’t Side with China 132

No NB – Japan Not Key – US Would Win 133

Taiwan Conflict ≠ Escalate 134

No China-US War 135

No China-US War 137

No China-US War 138

A2 Offsets Counterplans 139

139

Japan CP 140

Solvency Takeout/Turn 141

Guam Presence Good – Heg/Prolif 142

Guam Presence Good – Heg/Prolif 143

Guam Presence Good – Economy 144

Guam Presence Good – China and Terror (1/2) 145

Guam Presence Good – China and Terror (2/2) 146

Guam Presence Good – Asian Stability 147

Guam Wants Presence 148

CP Results in Guam Transfer 149

Long Timeframe 150

Afghanistan/Iraq CP 151

No Withdrawal – Stuck in Afghanistan 152

Non-Unique 153

Non-Unique 155

No Solvency – Flawed Strategy 156

No Solvency – Troops Not Key 157

No Solvency – McChrystal Was Key 158

No Solvency – Diplomacy First 159

Alt Cause – Reforms 160

Links to Politics 161

A2: Aff Fails 162

AT: December Review 163

A2: Kundahar Key 164

South Korea CP 165

SoKo – Aff Ans 166

SoKo – Aff Ans 167

Turkey CP 168

Strat Sheet 169

No Solvency – Negotiations Key 170

No Solvency – Negotiations Key/No US Involvement 171

No Impact – No Middle East Escalation 172

No Impact – Squo Solves PKK 173

No Impact – Squo Solves PKK 174

No Impact – US-Turkish Relations Resilient 175

No Impact – US-Turkish Relations Resilient 176

Phaseout CP 177

2AC – Top Level 178

2AC – Top Level 179

SoKo – AFF Ans 180

SoKo – AFF Ans 181

Condition CP 182

**Generic Aff** 183

Aff- Generic- Doesn’t Solve US leadership 184

Aff- Generic- Links to Politics 185

Aff- Generic- Links to Politics 187

Aff- Generic- Links to Politics 188

Aff- Generic- Links to Politics 190

**Aff- Afghanistan** 191

Aff- Afghanistan- Says NO 192

**Aff- Iraq** 193

Aff- Iraq- Says No- Democrats 194

Aff- Iraq- Says No 195

** Aff- Japan** 196

Aff- Japan- Says No 197

Aff- Japan- Says No 199

Aff- Japan –Says No 200

Aff- Japan- Says No 202

**Aff- S Korea** 203

Aff- S Korea- Backlash @ Pres 204

Aff- S Korea- Says No 205

Aff- S Korea- Says No 206

South Korea Condition CP 207

AFF – Conditions Bad 208

AFF - Politics NB – CP Unpopular 209

DPRK Says No 210

AFF – No Solvency – Conditions Bad 211

AFF – No Solvency – Can’t Solve Nukes 212

AFF - NPT Fails 213

AFF – Say No - Korea Won’t Sign the NPT 214

NPT Bad – Opaque Prolif 215

NPT Bad – Mini-Arsenal Turn 216

NPT Impact Takeout – Regional Non-Prolif Solves 217

North Korean Appeasement DA – Iran Module 218

North Korean Appeasement DA – Turns Net Benefit 219

North Korean Appeasement DA – Laundry List 220

Israel Relations DA 2AC 221

Israel Relations DA - Link Extension 223

Isreal Relations DA – WoT Impact Module 224

Turkey Condition CP 225

A2: Solvency – Reunification 226

A2: Solvency – Reunification 227

A2: Solvency – Reunification 228

A2: Solvency – Reunification 229

A2: Solvency – Withdrawal 230

A2: Solvency – Withdrawal 231

A2: Solvency – Concessions 232

A2: Solvency – Concessions 233

A2: Turkey Says Yes 234

A2: Turkey Says Yes 235

A2: Impact – Turkey-Greece War 236

A2: Impact – EU Accession 238

Conditions Bad 239



A2 Afghanistan Corruption CP
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   108

Добавить в свой блог или на сайт

Похожие:

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconNato training Mission-Afghanistan/Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (ntm-a/cstca): Building a Sustainable, Legitimate, Effective Afghan Security Force: a holistic Perspective

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconTackling Corruption And

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconFinancial Crime and Corruption

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconFinancial Crime and Corruption

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconFinancial Crime and Corruption

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconInsurgents in Afghanistan Are Gaining, Petraeus Says

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconThe Spread of Systemic Corruption in the Third World

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconAfghanistan 1ac contention One – The Language of War

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconBlunt: Obama needs to better define goals in Afghanistan

A2 Afghanistan Corruption cp 2 iconUnit corruption and other forms of unethical behaviour topics


Разместите кнопку на своём сайте:
lib.convdocs.org


База данных защищена авторским правом ©lib.convdocs.org 2012
обратиться к администрации
lib.convdocs.org
Главная страница