The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States




НазваниеThe United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States
страница3/24
Дата конвертации14.02.2013
Размер0.6 Mb.
ТипДокументы
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   24

***“Transportation Infrastructure Investment” – Affirmative

“Transportation Infrastructure Investment” – General

( ) Transportation Infrastructure Investment involves the purchase and construction of facilities


Department of Transportation 03 (U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, "Transportation Investment-Concepts, Data and Analysis," draft, compiled based on data from U.S. Department of Commerce (USDOC), Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), "Fixed Assets and Consumer Durables," and personal communications with BEA; and USDOC, U.S. Census Bureau, "Value of Construction Put in Place Statistics," Detailed Construction Expenditure Tables, available at http://www.census. gov, as of February 2003. http://www.bts.gov/publications/transportation_statistics_annual_report/2003/html/chapter_02/figure_109.html )

Investment in transportation infrastructure includes the purchase or construction value of transportation facilities and structures. Data on state and local transportation investment are not available separately. For rail infrastructure, only state and local investment from 1993 to 2000 are included. Government investment in pipeline infrastructure and federal investment spending on railroads are not covered due to lack of data. Investment in rolling stock consists of government outlays for motor vehicles only. Government spending on other rolling stocks (e.g., aircrafts, vessels, and boats) and other machinery and equipment used by federal, state, and local DOTs are not counted in the estimates due to lack of data. All dollar amounts are expressed in chained 1996 dollars, unless otherwise specified. Current dollar amounts (which are available in appendix B of this report

AT//Must be PPP

( ) Infrastructure investment is explicitly defined as solely government funded


EPA 9

(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Office of Grants and Debarment, “Definition of “Infrastructure” for Purposes of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009”, 5-8, http://www.epa.gov/ogd/forms/Definition_of_Infrastructure_for_ARRA.pdf)

EPA does not consider remediation activities conducted with Brownfields supplemental funds by tribes, private sector developers, non-profit organizations (except non-profit organizations that are councils of governments or regional or interstate governmental entities per 40 CFR 31.3 Local government) or other non-governmental borrowers or subgrantees to be infrastructure investments for the purposes of the certification and reporting requirements.

( ) Infrastructure investment doesn’t have to involve the private sector


DePonte 09

(Kelly DePonte, head of research and due diligence at Probitas Partners, former managing director at Pacific Corporate Group, MBA @ UCLA and BA @ Stanford, “The Definitive Guide to Infrastructure Fundraising,” Edited by Michael Halford, SJ Berwin LLP, September 2009, Chapter 1: “What are infrastructure funds?”, p. 1, http://www.probitaspartners.com/pdfs/Chapter+1_DePonte+%282%29.pdf)

Infrastructure investing covers a wide range of different project types with different risk-return profiles. These investment opportunities are capital-intensive and are either in heavily regulated industries (as with natural gas transmission) or are done under long-term concessions with public sector entities through public private partnerships (PPPs). Though most of the largest closed-end funds and publicly listed vehicles focused on infrastructure are diversified to some degree by project type and geography, it is useful to review in some detail the various sectors individually by project structure, industry sector and stage of development.

1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   24

Похожие:

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States iconResolution Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States iconResolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States icon1ac plan The United States federal government should substantially increase transportation infrastructure loans in the United States commensurate with establishment of an independent government-owned National Infrastructure Bank

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States icon1AC’s 1ac (Right) Plan The United States federal government should substantially increase investment in transportation infrastructure to make it more accessible

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States iconPlan The United States federal government should substantially increase loan guarantees for energy produced by integral fast reactors using the s-prism design in the United States

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States icon1ac plan: The United States federal government should substantially increase its investment in bus transit infrastructure through an expanded fuel cell electric bus program

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States icon1ac plan – with s-prism the United States federal government should substantially increase loan guarantees for integral fast reactors using the s-prism design

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States icon1ac the United States federal government should reduce restrictions that disproportionately affect small modular nuclear reactors in the United States

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States iconPlan The United States Federal Government should obtain, through alternative financing, electricity from small modular reactors for military facilities in the United States

The United States federal government should substantially increase its transportation infrastructure investment in the United States icon1ac plan The United States Federal Government should obtain electricity from small modular reactors for military bases in the United States. Adv 1


Разместите кнопку на своём сайте:
lib.convdocs.org


База данных защищена авторским правом ©lib.convdocs.org 2012
обратиться к администрации
lib.convdocs.org
Главная страница