Скачать 189.13 Kb.
Remember: The Air France Concorde crashed into a hotel building after takeoff from Charles de Gaulle airport on 25 July 2000. Points to be noted here that building didn't collapse as in 911 in New York.
The Truth Will Set You Free (Daily Update):
The Great Historic Movie on 9-+-11 TRUTH: Loose Change 2nd Edition Re-cut
Click here to watch Loose Change - 2nd Edition
Why did WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 collapses? Were there explosives planted?
Dr. Robert Bowman: the impossibility of the official government story
Why Lebanon? Why now?
War on Terror
Who Speaks For Islam?
Who Hijacked my Religion?
The Hidden Secret of CORPORATION, a Documentary Movie as shown on Canadian CBC TV.
Also more on CBC NEWS: SUNDAY NIGHT
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2006
9/11: TRUTH, LIES AND CONSPIRACY
According to a recent Zogby poll, 42% of Americans believe the U.S. government and its 9/11 Commission concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks. Did the 9/11 Commission fully investigate the events of that day? Is the U.S. government covering up key information about the attacks? Was 9/11 an inside job? CBC News: Sunday talks to the 9/11 Commission and the young student filmmakers behind the internet documentary Loose Change, to get to the heart of what's fueling the public's distrust of the U.S. government and the events of September 11.
READ THE COMPLETE INTERVIEWS:
[NB: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in blank window.]
A FATHER'S JOURNEY
When the second tower collapsed in New York, this father's life collapsed along with it. Canadian Bob Ewart lost his daughter and son in law. Today, as part of the journey forward, Bob Ewart makes the journey back to Ground Zero.
Some of the clearest proof that 9/11 was an act of United States Sponsored Terrorism comes from a close examination of the Pentagon Attack. In the above picture by Daryl Donley taken minutes after the attack at the Pentagon, the intense fireball is seen as coming from inside the building, and no wreckage of an airline crash is apparent.
Where is the wing, tail and engine of the plane at Pantagon?
Welcome to http://911review.org
New book by 9/11 commission co-chairman- NORAD FAA DOD Pentagon LIED
hi Sane Person. thanks for stopping by. i'll address two of your points.
Quote 1: "First off, an aluminum plane weighing several tons travelling at 500 miles per hour would most certainly be able to penetrate the WTC."
"most certainly" isn't exactly arguing a point.
if a real plane hit the WTC it would resemble the plane that hit the Empire State building decades ago:
airplanes are largely made of aluminum. wings are made of fiberglass. there ain't no way an airplane is going to disappear into a steel building without any pieces breaking off.
Quote 2: "First live video was from North" starts out the with the hilarious statement that UA175 was fueled with diesel fuel."
Jet fuel is refined kerosene. Kero burns around 650 Celcius. Steel melts at 2000 degrees Celcius. so, just as a stove doesn't melt when you light a burner on top, so too the Towers would not have melted in their footprints because of kerosene burning in the open air.
Mon, Sep 11 19:47:52 2006 - 220.127.116.11 - message #44
First off, an aluminum plane weighing several tons travelling at 500 miles per hour would most certainly be able to penetrate the WTC. What do you suppose should have happened--should it have bounced off the side of the building? (I don't know if you were too high to notice this or not, but there was a lot of glass on the side of the buildings, too.)
Your "did CNN air fake video" page is what really got me. Your points are embarassing to read:
Like points 3 & 4: The "wind" and "weather" reports. You say the reports say the wind was at 300. So the wind was coming from the Northwest, which means it was blowing *from the northwest towards the southeast*. You even bring up the fact the the wind is blowing towards the southeast in your expert photoanalysis--so if the weather report is verifying the photographic evidence, ummm, what's the conspiracy?
A Sane Person
Mon, Sep 11 00:03:27 2006 - 18.104.22.168 - message #43
Point 5: "First live video was from North" starts out the with the hilarious statement that UA175 was fueled with diesel fuel. Do you even know what you're talking about? Are you high as a kite? Did I really need to ask? Jet planes do not run on diesel fuel. Trains do, semi-trailers do, planes do not.
You go on to question how somebody could possibly move camera locations in 15 short minutes--um, they got up and moved?--though to my untrained eye, it looks like they just zoomed in a bit. Then you go on to ask where all the buildings in the background are. Last time I checked, the WTC was at the southern tip of Manhattan, and that shot is, as you said, from the North. It probably would be helpful for you to know that these were also the tallest buildings around at the time, and the camera was zoomed in towards the top of them (the flat parts where the sliver of the buildings meet the blue of the sky would be the top there, you see.)
Finally, you ask why the plane is in shadow in the frames where it's approaching the WTC. Take a look at those frames again. Notice the smoke? I'm sure you did, because you pointed out the highlights on them elsewhere. Well, those "highlights" on the smoke are where the sun is shining on it, which, in turn, means that the smoke is blocking the sun from things behind it, a phenonmenon we non-stoners in fact refer to as: a "shadow."
A Sane Person
Mon, Sep 11 00:02:47 2006 - 22.214.171.124 - message #42
Damn dude, I really wanted to refute all the points in your site, but it is just so damned big and chock full of all sorts of dumb sh**. You ask why people were filming from the south side instead of from the north after the North tower was hit. Duh, because *that's where they were?* Because they were getting footage of the smoke coming out of that big building they saw to the north of them?
Your "notes" on "banking" are laughable, too. You don't seem to be able to take into account that, from a fixed camera angle, a plane could indeed look like it was headed to the right even when it was banking to the left.
I'm certain your "enemies" at Indymedia and The History Channel are erasing your posts for a good reason--they don't want to be seen giving a venue to ideas as dumb as the ones on this site. I can't say that I blame them.
A Sane Person
Mon, Sep 11 00:02:11 2006 - 126.96.36.199 - message #41
Your "hoax" theory is so full of holes that I suggest the only "hoax" is this website. You offer no proof, just statements of fact. Sorry, but saying "the media doctored the footage" doesn't make it a fact. To pull off a hoax of this magnitude would require thousands of people and months if not years of planning. Yet you don't have a single person who has stepped forward to say they were involved. As for doctoring footage, it would take dozens of FX wizards a month or so of pre-planning, and at least a week from the time of the event to composite planes into all footage. It's impossible to pull off within minutes of the attacks, from multiple angles no less. And that assumes that they got hold of EVERY bit of footage taken of the event. SOMEONE would have home video of the second tower exploding sans plane if indeed there was no plane. Tens of thousands of witnesses watched planes fly into buildings. Or are they part of it? And controlled demolition? It takes teams of experts months to prep buildings for that level of demo. No one in the THREE buildings noticed the teams tearing walls out and setting charges? No one tripped on the MILES of wires it would require? The list is growing. And the airlines? Where are the planes? Are they in on it too? One person. Produce ONE. Until then, your theories are ridiculous. The burden of proof is on you to PROVE your theories, not just make irresponsible claims. Or, is this the real hoax?
Sun, Sep 10 20:56:53 2006 - 188.8.131.52 - message #40
Regardless of speculation about the 911 attack, we need to focus on what we know for sure. The administration had already planned the invasion of Iraq to achieve its political and financial goals. Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden were always bitter enemies and not partners in the 911 attack. The al Q sought to overthrow Hussein and start a civil war in Iraq. What we had on 9/11/01 was a situation of America trapped between enemies without and within. We could have struck the al Q at known positions in Afghanistan but this would have defeated the goals of Bush and Cheney. It is absolute fact that the administration ignored countless reports from the FBI, the CIA and global intelligence because they knew an attack on opur United States would give them the ability to manipulate our patriotism and the press. Bush subordinates John Pondexter and Paul Wolfkowitz, former bin Laden allies from the Reagan administration (where we unlawfully supported the al Q against Soviet backed armies) were observed smiling after the attack because they knew the administration would totally benefit from this. We must be the eye of a growing internet hurricane that will launch American Revolution 2 and bing us to direct democracy, national mandates and 24/7 online control of our progressive and compassionate destiny. Join the American Coalition 4 Direct Democracy (a concept not a group) and follow our developing third party coalition. You be da boss now!
Doug Johnson , American Revolution Two
Sun, Aug 13 16:06:05 2006 - 184.108.40.206 - message #39
Hoax - I guess the world is flat too. Don't believe everything you think you see. It really happened, get over it.
Wed, Jul 26 11:40:03 2006 - 220.127.116.11 - message #38
Google: Stoelting Ultrascribe polygraph
David Howard , Marion, Florence or Leavenworth
Thu, Jun 29 12:29:29 2006 - 18.104.22.168 - message #37
Mon, Jun 26 21:17:18 2006 - 22.214.171.124 - message #36
I just registered as a new member of this site which I discovered accidently while surfing the net.
Let me make sure I have this right: am I correct that there are people who are seriously posting comments on this site stating that 911 was a hoax?
If this is true, then what I say is dircted at YOU, i.e., the person who really believes this and is not joking I do not expect you to change your opinion. Your mental illness prevents you from doing that. Suffice it to say that you are truly sick. A convicted rapist has more integrity and intellectual honesty than you. Part of me laughs at you, part of me feels sad for you.
There has to be a God because only a devine force could keep stupid people like you alive for so long after being born.
Mon, Jun 26 20:18:52 2006 - 126.96.36.199 - message #35
I heard this song called "Iraq" by a musician from San Diego, CA by the name of TIMZ. The song sent chills throughout my body. His words are so powerful and they convey my exact feelings. Hear it for yourself at: Just click play song, you can even download it from this site.
George Bush, I hope you are listening.
Wed, Jun 21 17:19:50 2006 - 188.8.131.52 - message #34
The strange projectiles, seen flying from the WTC, are supposed to be pieces of metal melted by the Thermite used for the WTC demolition. Also doesn't anyone remember the interview on 20/20, Nightline, or 60 minutes, I don't remember which, where about 7 NYC FBI agents retired in protest. They stated that they "had" the same 16 hijackers about 5 years before 9/11. They were not allowed to pursue the investigation, on these suspects. The orders to "cease and desist" were coming from the White House. These interviews took place about 4-5 months after 9/11. By the way, I have a copy of the transcripts, of an interview with Donald Rumsfeld, where he admits that the Pentagon was hit by a missle. If anybody wants a copy email me and I will send you a copy, ASAP. Take Care and
Sat, Jun 10 19:18:15 2006 - 184.108.40.206 - message #33
1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon.
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorise you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.
Matt Marriott , 9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, -1
Thu, May 18 07:33:11 2006 - 220.127.116.11 - message #32
Google Search: "Arrest Bush 41"
David Howard , 9/11 and October Surprise scandal
Fri, May 12 17:34:23 2006 - 18.104.22.168 - message #31
Aluminum planes CAN enter buildings. The World Trade Centers were NOT made of steel on the outside, but concrete. The inside was made of ASTM-E119, a super high-grade steel. Let's think like you for a second. What do you think would have happened if a plane going at 300 MPH hit the strongest building in New York City?
Sat, Apr 29 20:08:55 2006 - 22.214.171.124 - message #30
you know what i kinda find funny...on show biz tongight when they ask the audience about 9/11 anda u.s cover up the people that believe the government dont even give facts they just call us insane. That is saying a lot because that basically saying they have no facts behind what they are saying
Fri, Mar 31 11:43:24 2006 - 126.96.36.199 - message #29
George (Flipper) Bush is a disgrace to the american people, he used his powers as flipper-in chief to destroy a country for his own personal revenge. He is killing American soldiers daily, and innocent Iraqi citizen's becaus Saddam tried to kill his daddy in 1991 Golf War, and said in his demented speech that GOD told him to do it. The time is now to take him, and his puppet Tricky Dicky out of office, Vote to Impeach PuppetMaster Bush, before this country losses the respect it has in the world.
Wed, Jan 4 21:10:32 2006 - 188.8.131.52 - message #28
Hey John, interesting link from CNN. It is amazing how casual they are over the five frames the Pentagon released. Like the Pentagon, the most heavily surveilled corridor in the world, can't produce more than five still photos of the Boeing which strikes it.
Harry Lime , Why only Five Frames?
Tue, Feb 1 20:58:43 2005 - 184.108.40.206 - message #27
CNN admits an airplane Did Not hit the Pentagon on 9-11 !!
This is a copy of a letter I wrote to the editor of CNN's web site division.
Please see the link for yourself :-)
The website is about the pictures the DoD released of the so called plane hitting the Pentagon.
This story starts with this statement:
"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Department of Defense on Thursday released a series of photos taken by a security camera that show the fireball from a hijacked airliner crashing into the Pentagon on September 11."
You see, here is More Proof an Airplane did Not crash into the Pentagon. By this stories own words, a Fireball crashed into the Pentagon. I agree with this.
Fireball in this sentence, Is the SUBJECT. Also, please put a comma, after the word 'airliner'.
O.k., Now that I have proven the truth of this disaster, and the truth that I have better journalism skills than the writer of this story, may I have a job?
Tue, Feb 1 17:03:26 2005 - 220.127.116.11 - message #26
i never get tired of watching "flight 175" enter the South Tower like a knife through butter.
Harry Lime , Boeing Butter
Mon, Dec 13 20:31:58 2004 - 18.104.22.168 - message #25
a discussion of the "no planes theory".
Harry Lime , Media Hoax Theory
Sun, Nov 7 18:53:56 2004 - 22.214.171.124 - message #24
Great article by Stan Smith about 911.
Harry Lime , Stan Smith on 911 Truth
Sun, Nov 7 18:35:00 2004 - 126.96.36.199 - message #23
From Chappaquiddick to New York and Washington : Through Oklahoma City
Format ISBN Price
Paperback (6x9) 1418484539 $17.75
Dust Jacket Hardcover (6x9) 1418484520 $28.50
About the Book
This book starts the process of tying together scattered threads, which run from the Chappaquiddick ‘accident’ up to the bombings of the Murrah Building and World Trade Towers. Where the evidence indicates varying possibilities this is pointed out, but without blandly burying the issue of ‘what happened’ under a philosophical cover.
About the Author
The author’s formal academic training has been in mathematics. As a teenager the author picked up an enthusiasm for voracious reading on the side, outside of any formal academic training, yet supplementing the latter
This point about the “controlled demolition” pattern which was followed, not only by the North and South towers of the World Trade Center, but also identically by Building 7, which was never claimed to have been hit by any plane, is worth comparing, for example, with photos of Hamburg in July 1943. The firestorms which hit this city were much more devastating than anything which could have been created by two jetliners crashing. Yet, even here, the pattern which shows through, from aerial and ground photos taken after the bombing, is one of long rows of building shells surviving and standing, though horribly gutted out. The claim that two American jetliners would have accomplished a more thorough leveling to the ground of three distinct Trade Tower buildings than the RAF and USAAF were able to accomplish in Hamburg is absurd.
, click here
Wed, Jul 28 09:05:18 2004 - 188.8.131.52 - message #22
Democracy Now! has agreed to have David Ray Griffen appear.
Took them long enough though.
Sat, May 15 15:24:04 2004 - 184.108.40.206 - message #21
Please join this highly important campaign to get Democracy Now! to have author David Ray Griffin appear. Thanks.
, Waking Amy
Mon, Apr 19 19:09:20 2004 - 220.127.116.11 - message #20
Louis Freeh and the VanPac Case... It was Murder at the highest level !
On the day Judge Robert Vance was murdered Louis Freeh was an unknown prosecutor in the state of New York. Three years later Louis Freeh was director of the FBI.
Although Vance's caseload was 60% drug related, the FBI, the agency that never communicates with the CIA, immediately responded "drugs were no more prominent than several other avenues we are following". But Vance had been preparing to hear a series of cases, all pointing to the CIA as a major source of Cocaine... and Vance had a reputation for absolute and dogmatic honesty. The FBI soon "discovered" from the records of Vance's prior trials that the bombs were EXACT duplicates of bombs Walter Leroy Moody had sent years earlier. Supposedly, Moody had painted both cardboard box bombs interiors with black paint, used the exact same welded end caps etc etc... Supposedly Moody must have been rather stupid and not known the bombs would point directly to him like a Neon sign. But Moody did not know how to weld. Ted Banks was accused of doing the welding.... a deal was struck to pin it all on Moody. A conviction was secured and the case drifted into history.
Then it all unraveled. In Federal Appeals court counterfeiter turned patriot Ted Banks blew the whistle on then Assistant U.S. Atty. Louis Freeh. Patriot Banks accepted a ten year addition to his sentence as the price of telling the truth. He pointed at Freeh from the stand and said "I lied and he told me to Lie, I never welded no bombs for Moody". Then FBI agent Whitehurst charged the FBI had fabricated evidence, ... then the Vance bomb was identified in the Unabom case as originating from Saratoga California.... then the world court threw out the Lockerby conviction cause FBI agent J Thomas Thurman could not be trusted...because he was not credible in their eyes after his role in the Vance debacle... and the US press is still silent.
The site, Unabombers.com, provides insights into the activities of the FBI/CIA pre September 11th 2001. Activities that include the manufacture and management of a series of high profile, random terrorist events and selective assassinations. The facts have been covered up, despite a wide trail of undeniable proof and multiple witnesses. They are presented at http://www.unabombers.com
Hopefully some day they will erect a statue to Ted Banks just like the one they erected to Nathan Hale at yale...the same pose would be appropriate since they both did essentially the same thing. I would like to suggest an inscription for that day and that statue ... "His currency was counterfeit but his character was not !" http://www.unabombers.com
, click here
Tue, Apr 13 02:39:18 2004 - 18.104.22.168 - message #19
MSNBC was asking people to submit questions the 911 Coverup Committee could ask Condi. Here's what I sent them:
"Reports from the New York Times and other New York media sources confirm that the WTC rubble was removed (i.e., actually sold for scrap) prior to it being thoroughly inspected by qualified investigators. What role did you play in authorizing the removal of the WTC rubble?"
Thu, Apr 8 06:28:53 2004 - 22.214.171.124 - message #18
9/11 is the conclusion of a series of state sponsored terrorism events aimed at taking over the government. They made the most mistakes early on the the process, and that is a good place to look for evidence of what is really going on. Unabom is the start of the path that leads to 9/11 and the Iraq war. Its the same players all the way through...guys like Agent J. Thomas Thurman, Henry Murray, or even Donald Rumsfeld. Unabombers.com provides insights into the activities of the FBI/CIA pre September 11th 2001. Activities that include the manufacture and management of a series of high profile, random terrorist events and selective assassinations. It is a worthwhile read.
DanPride , Pre 9/11 Events
Tue, Mar 30 09:20:26 2004 - 126.96.36.199 - message #17
911 is a subject of passionate research of mine.
Sun, Mar 28 19:12:50 2004 - 188.8.131.52 - message #16
Выставочная компания мидэкспо поздравляет победителей 4-й Национальной Премии за лучшие решения по оснащению системами автоматизации...
Н-adducts of 1,2,4-triazine 4-oxides with carbanions in reactions of nucleophilic substitution of hydrogen. Mendeleev Commun. 2000,...