Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words




НазваниеAdobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words
страница15/20
Дата конвертации28.10.2012
Размер0.51 Mb.
ТипДокументы
1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20

SUP. YAROSLAVSKY: THAT WOULD EVEN BE BETTER THAN YOUR OPINION. THANK YOU, RAY.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: A FEW PEOPLE HAVE ASKED TO SPEAK. ARNOLD SACHS, AND JOHN WALSH AND RAMON RUBALCAVA. PLEASE COME FORWARD. REALIZING THAT THE-- THAT THE MOTION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. OKAY. I HAVE BEEN ADVISED THAT RUBALCAVA WILL NOT SPEAK.


SUP. ANTONOVICH: I THINK THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO SPEAK, MADAME CHAIR. WE'RE ON THE TOPIC.


JOHN WALSH: WE'VE BEEN HERE FOR EIGHT HOURS--


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: I CALLED ON THEM TO SPEAK. I JUST CALLED THEM. I SAID I WAS JUST ADVISED THAT RUBALCAVA HAS ELECTED NOT TO SPEAK. AND WE CALLED ON THEM TO SPEAK.


SUP. ANTONOVICH: GOOD.


JOHN WALSH: THANK YOU. YOU WERE CALLED FIRST.


ARNOLD SACHS: THANK YOU. ARNOLD SACHS. I, TOO, WAS AT THE M.T.A. BOARD MEETING AND I APPLAUD YOU, SUPERVISOR MOLINA, FOR THE ACTION YOU TOOK. MY QUESTION WAS-- AND I BELIEVE YOU DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH.


SUP. MOLINA: I DIDN'T GO FAR ENOUGH?


ARNOLD SACHS: WELL ACTUALLY TODAY. BECAUSE YOUR ARGUMENT WAS BASED ON THE FACT THAT THEY WERE SPENDING PUBLIC FUNDS FROM PROP A . AND PROP A WAS WRITTEN SO THAT IT MENTIONED THAT FUNDING COULD NOT BE SPENT FOR SUBWAY LINES.


SUP. MOLINA: THAT'S THE TRUTH.


ARNOLD SACHS: I BELIEVE THAT YOUR STAFF GOT TOGETHER, YOU HAD IT ON GOOD INTENTION, AND THE STAFF OF COUNCILMAN KATZ GOT TOGETHER. HE WAS ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROOM. AND THE C.E.O. OF THE M.T.A. WHO SAT NEXT TO HIM, HIS STAFF, EVERYBODY GOT TOGETHER, AND THE DECIDING PART OF IT WAS THAT IT WASN'T PROP A FUNDS, THE SUBWAY, IT WAS A DIFFERENT PROP A. SO IN ESSENCE, THERE'S TWO PROP A'S. THE $4.5 MILLION THAT YOU MENTIONED THERE AND HERE FOR A COUNTY-WIDE MAILER, THIS IS $12 MILLION TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREA. WHY THE DIFFERENTIAL IN $12 MILLION TO THE UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF THE COUNTY, AND AND $4 MILLION FOR A COUNTY-WIDE MAILER, NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING? WHY AN EXTRA $8 MILLION INTO THE UNINCORPORATED AREA WHEN IT'S LIKE A PIMPLE ON AN ELEPHANT'S BUTT, QUESTION NUMBER ONE?


SUP. MOLINA: IT'S A QUICK ANSWER. JUST TO BE LUDICROUS, OKAY?


ARNOLD SACHS: WHATEVER, I'M JUST SAYING. I'M POINTING IT OUT. IT COULD BE TRUE. I'VE COME BEFORE THIS BOARD AND ARGUED ABOUT FUNDING. THE POINT I'M MAKING IS, THERE IS A PROP A, VERSUS PROP A. I'VE COME BEFORE AND SAID, WHERE YOU HAVE THE MID CITY, YOU HAVE THE EXPOSITION LIGHT RAIL LINE GETTING FUNDED AND YOU HAVE A MID CITY EXPOSITION LIGHT RAIL FUNDING. OVER $7.5 MILLION. TWO DIFFERENT NAMES FOR THE SAME PROJECT. BUT THEY'RE BOTH GETTING FUNDED. HERE YOU HAVE ONE NAME FOR TWO DIFFERENT PROJECTS. ONE PROP A THAT ELIMINATES-- THAT RESTRICTS YOU FROM FUNDING TRANSIT, SUBWAY TRANSIT PROJECTS, AND ONE PROP A THAT ALLOWS YOU TO FUND SUBWAY TRANSIT PROJECTS. BUT IT'S BOTH PROP A'S. TALK TO THE PUBLIC HOW YOU FIGURE IT OUT. SAME DIFFERENCE.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: YOUR TIME IS UP. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE'D LIKE TO CALL REVEREND TILLMAN AND GRACIE TAYLOR TO COME UP. MR. WALSH, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.


JOHN WALSH: JOHN WALSH, TEACHER L.A.U.S.D. ONE QUARTER CENTURY. I'M NOT INTERESTED IN A LAWSUIT. I'M INTERESTED IN A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. I'M GOING TO MR. DEMERJIAN OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL. THESE ARE THE PEOPLE I WANT TO BE ANSWERING QUESTIONS UNDER OATH. JAIME DELAVEGA WHO WORKS FOR ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA, ROGER SNOBEL, THE CONVERSATIONS THEY HAD, THE KATZ CONVERSATIONS. THIS WAS ALL HANDLED ON A HIGH-LEVEL. NOW COUNTY COUNSEL HAS SAID UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT HE DID NOT REVIEW THIS AD. PAGE A13 ON SEPTEMBER 23RD L.A. TIMES. THERE IS-- WAIT A SECOND. NOW REMEMBER WHEN THEY ATTACKED YOU, MISS MOLINA? YOU GOT UP AND YOU SAID: THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE 30 YEARS IN THIS ADVERTISEMENT. AND THEY SAID YOU WERE A LIAR. NOW, I'VE GOT IT RIGHT HERE. THERE IS NO MENTION OF THE 30 YEARS. AND MR. YAROSLAVSKY AND THE MAYOR OWE YOU AN APOLOGY. I'M GOING TO SPEAK IN SPANISH NOW. [SPEAKS SPANISH] AND YOU GET THE INTERPRETER UP HERE TO TELL THEM WHAT THE WORD ARISCO MEANS. [SPEAKS SPANISH]. YOU WERE TREATED, YOU WERE BEATEN UP, YOU WERE-- AND THEY KEPT SAYING, "YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING." THEY TREATED YOU-- YAROSLAVSKY TREATED YOU LIKE YOU WERE HIS SERVANT, LIKE YOU WERE HIS MAID. AND THE MAYOR OF THIS CITY TREATED YOU LIKE YOU WERE HIS EX-WIFE. [LAUGHTER.]


SPEAKER: WELL, WELL.


JOHN WELSH: AND EVERYBODY SAT THERE. NOW YOU DON'T HEAR YAROSLAVSKY INTERRUPTING ME NOW BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. DO YOU KNOW THE RULES? WHEN YOU GO TO DIVERSION, YOU HAVE TO DO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. AND AS FOR THE EDITORS OF THE "L.A. TIMES," DO YOU THINK THEY'RE GOING TO DO A STORY ON THIS? THE L.A. TIMES IS FOR MEASURE R. I WANT TO FINISH BY SAYING, LISTEN, "L.A. TIMES," EVERYBODY'S FOR THIS. WE ARE GOING TO DEFEAT THIS. AND THEIR ADS, DO YOU KNOW WHAT I WANT TO DO TO THEIR ADS? THIS IS WHAT THEY'RE WORTH. $4 1/2 MILLION AND I'LL FINISH WITH THIS. THERE IS NO PRO AND CON IN THIS GUY. IMPARTIAL MEANS PRO AND CON. I DON'T KNOW WHERE MR. FORTNER IS. I THOUGHT YOU WERE OUT MAYBE VOMITING IN THE TOILET. THERE HAS NO "YOU SHOW ME AND I'LL KISS YOUR FEET" WHERE THERE'S ANY PRO AND CON HERE. YOU SHOW ME IN THIS AD, WHICH YOU'RE A LITTLE DIFFERENT ABOUT, YOU'RE NOT SAYING THIS AD IS-- YOU DIDN'T APPROVE THIS ONE. IT APPEARED. WHY DID THIS APPEAR? BECAUSE THE MAYOR, THE MAYOR PUSHED IT. LET ME FINISH BY SAYING THIS $30 BILLION HERE IN A CITY WHERE GANGSTERS KILL PEOPLE FOR $50 OR $60 DRUG DEALS.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. REVEREND TILLMAN AND THEN GRACIE TAYLOR.


REV. C.R. TILLMAN: THANK YOU, MADAME CHAIRMAN. I'M A LITTLE BIT SPEECHLESS BY THE PRESENTATION, AS I'M SURE YOU MIGHT BE. BUT THERE'S SOME SUBSTANCE TO IT. AND WE CAN ALL LEARN FROM THE SUBSTANTIVE PART OF IT. I'M GOING TO GO ON A DIFFERENT BRANCH. I'M GOING TO READ YOU A SECTION FROM SOME TIME AGO BEFORE EITHER OF YOU WERE BORN HERE, WITH THE EXCEPTION MAYBE OF MY SUPERVISOR NORTON HAD MADE POLITICAL ENEMIES DUE TO HIS PREVIOUS RECALL EFFORTS. YOU MIGHT SAY WELL WHO'S NORTON? WELL HE WAS A SUPERVISOR. HIS NAME WAS RICHARD HENRY NORTON. THIS IS BACK IN 1912 TO 1917. I WAS JUST JOKING, ANTONOVICH.


SUP. ANTONOVICH: I HAD A FACE LIFT.


REV. C.R. TILLMAN: BUT, ANYWAY, I'M GOING TO READ ON. IN THE SPRING OF 1917, FORMAL CHARGES OF MISAPPROPRIATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS WERE LEVIED AGAINST NORTON, AND THE REST OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WHO WERE SLEEPING, BASED UPON LEGAL TECHNICALITIES INVOLVING THE SUPERVISORS, WHOSE JOB RESPONSIBILITY AND THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS WITHIN A COUNTY TREASURER'S OFFICE. NORTON WAS REMOVED FROM OFFICE. AFTER HIS REMOVAL, CHARGES AGAINST THE OTHER SUPERVISORS WERE DROPPED. SO, SUPERVISOR MOLINA, YOU HAVE GOOD REASON TO BE CONCERNED BECAUSE OF YOUR PERSONAL LIABILITY. AND YOU CAN'T ALWAYS DO THE RULE OF FIVE THAT CHRIS SUTTON DID THAT HAPPENS HERE, THAT YOU JUST AS A BUDDY SYSTEM CO-SIGN WITHOUT THINKING WITH YOUR BRAIN AND YOUR HEART. WHATEVER HE WANTS, MIKE ANTONOVICH CAN HAVE IT. NO, HE CAN'T. BECAUSE YOU CAN BE PERSONALLY LIABLE. AND THERE COULD BE A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION. IN FACT, THE BIRDS SAY THERE IS ONE ALREADY STARTED, AN INVESTIGATION. SO AND THAT'S NOT JUST UNDER THIS CIRCUMSTANCE. THERE IS OTHERS, INCLUDING LIKE THE ELECTION IN ALTADENA. THAT IS A FEDERAL PROTECTED ELECTION. AND YOU CAN'T PLAY AROUND WITH ELECTIONS. YOU CAN'T SAY THAT THIS IS JUST A LOW KEY COMMUNITY ELECTION DOESN'T COUNT. NO, IT DOES. ASK COUNTY COUNCIL. IT'S STATE SANCTIONED. THOSE INVESTIGATIONS ARE GOVERNED BY THE F.B.I. SO ONCE AGAIN, WE FIND OURSELVES AT A POINT WHERE WE GOT TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS AND WE GOT TO GET GOOD LEGAL COUNSEL. AND ONE OF THE THINGS I'D ASK COUNTY COUNSEL TO DO, AND THAT IS TO REVIEW THE RULES OF THE PACT IN ALTADENA AND HE CAN VERIFY SECTION 600 SAYS THE BOARD HAS 30 DAYS TO VERIFY AND VALIDATE AN ELECTION. 30 DAYS FROM OUR ELECTION. OUR ELECTION WAS JULY 28TH. THAT GIVES HIM UNTIL AUGUST 27TH TO VERIFY IT. YOU VERIFIED OUR ELECTION SEPTEMBER 9TH. AND ALL OF YOU ACQUIESCED AND SIGNED ON BOARD. ANYBODY WHO READS ENGLISH COULD TELL IT WASN'T 30 DAYS. SO I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND I THANK YOU FOR BEING SERIOUS ABOUT YOUR JOBS.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: MISS TAYLOR?


GRACIE TAYLOR: YES. AS YOU KNOW, I DELETED NAME GRAY. I AM A VICTIM. THE REASON I'M SPEAKING ON THIS ITEM HERE IS BECAUSE I WAS DOWNTOWN HERE. I WAS WAITING AT THE BUS STOP WITH A 19 YEAR OLD FEMALE. THE BUS DRIVER CAME UP. HE LET HER ON. I GOT ON AND HE CLOSED THE DOOR ON ME, AND HE STARTED DRAGGING ME. IF IT WASN'T IN THE NAME OF JESUS-- IF IT WASN'T FOR THE MAN STANDING THERE, I DON'T KNOW WHERE I WOULD HAVE BEEN. I WAS PICKED UP BY ONE OF THE MEN THAT HAD WITNESSED THAT, AND THEY SNATCHED THE KEYS BECAUSE HE WAS GETTING READY TO DRIVE OFF. HE ALMOST HIT ANOTHER PERSON. UP UNTIL NOW, I'VE BEEN OPERATED ON THERE AT CEDARS SINAI HOSPITAL. I'M CRIPPLED. TOTALLY CRIPPLED. AND THE RECORDS SAID HEALING MIGHT BE A FAILURE. I AM A GRANDMOTHER AND A MOTHER. I'M 75 YEARS OF AGE. I HAVE A GRANDDAUGHTER, MIKHAILA'S TALKING ABOUT THE TROOPS. I AM A GRANDDAUGHTER THAT SERVED IN THE NAVY. WHERE IS SHE? I DON'T KNOW WHERE SHE'S AT. I DON'T KNOW WHERE JOSEPH'S AT. WINFRED IS A RETARDED CHILD. I SEE HIM EVERY NOW AND THEN. I USED TO WORK FOR THE COUNTY, THE CITY, THE STATE. I AM NOT GETTING MY UNEMPLOYMENT. I'M NOT GETTING ANY S.S.I., ANY KIND, FOR INSTANCE I'M SUPPOSED TO GET WHENEVER YOU DO WORK, I'M NOT GETTING THAT. MY CHILDREN IS SUPPORTING ME. AND IT HAS BEEN A GREAT DEAL OF HARDSHIP ON MY FAMILY. THIS IS MY SISTER EUNICE. SHE PASSED AWAY BUT THEY STILL HAVE HERS LIVING. ALL MY I.D. WAS STOLEN FROM ME WHEN I WAS RECUPERATING AT PANAMA. MY I.D. HAS BEEN USED VERY MUCH. WHENEVER I STAND ON THE BUS STOP, I'M REMINDED BY MARTIN LUTHER KING WHEN HE SAID, "WE SHALL OVERCOME." I'VE HAD BUS DRIVERS TO BE VERY RUDE AND PASS ME DIRECT BY. MANY OF TIMES. RECENTLY THEY EVEN HAD ME AS DRIVING A BUS. I DO NOT DRIVE A BUS. I DO DRIVE. YOU KNOW, THE WORD OF GOD IS THAT IF YOU HURT A PERSON, BE QUICK ABOUT TELLING THE MATTER BEFORE THAT PERSON DELIVER YOU UP AT THE COURT. I DID CALL THEM AND I TRIED TO SETTLE SOME ISSUES WITH THEM. IT WAS TO NO AVAIL AT ALL. SO I FILED THE LAWSUIT. AND WHEN I FILED THE LAWSUIT, I WENT IN AND I WAS SCREAMED AT, "WHAT DO YOU WANT?" AND THE LAWYER, I DON'T KNOW HOW HE FILED ANYTHING. BECAUSE ONCE YOU FILE DEFAULT YOU CANNOT FILE ANYTHING AT ALL. SO I TOLD HIM YOU KNOW I SAY THIS PERSON REPRESENTING M.T.A. M.T.A. HAVE ALMOST DAMAGED MY LIFE. I'M 75 YEARS OF AGE. WELL, CASE DISMISSED. I JUST WANT TO LET MY GUY TALK TO YOU. SO HE DID TALK BEFORE THE WEEK WAS DONE, A TRAIN DERAILED AND IT STILL IS DERAILING. MY ISSUE IS AT HAND.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: THANK YOU. YOUR TIME IS UP.


GRACIE TAYLOR: THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU ALL TO LOOK INTO IT. BECAUSE IF YOU HURT A PERSON.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: WE'LL HAVE SOMEONE LOOK AT IT. WE HAVE 95-D AND 74 BEFORE WE GO INTO THE BUDGET.


SUP. ANTONOVICH: LET ME, MADAME CHAIR. I WAS NOT AT THE VOTE AT THE M.T.A. WHEN THAT APPROVAL, THAT ALLOCATION OF, WHAT, $12 MILLION WAS APPROVED.


SUP. YAROSLAVSKY: IT WASN'T 12 MILLION?


SUP. ANTONOVICH: HOW MUCH WAS IT, 4 MILLION? FOUR? OKAY, $4 MILLION IN A FUND THAT SHOULD BE GOING WHEN WE HEAR FROM THE INDIVIDUALS EACH WEEK ABOUT THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL BUS SERVICE OR PROBLEMS IN HAVING TO CUT LINES BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE RESOURCES. EVEN A HIGH SCHOOL GOVERNMENT STUDENT WOULD TELL YOU THAT THIS IS A POLITICAL MAILING. IT DOESN'T SAY YES, THIS WILL HAPPEN IF YOU VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND NO, THIS WILL HAPPEN IF YOU VOTE AGAINST IT AND WHAT THE PROPONENTS SAY AND WHAT THE OPPONENTS SAY. DO WHAT THEY DO WITH THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS WHEN THEY SEND OUT A BOOKLET RELATIVE TO THE STATE PROPOSITIONS. THEY GIVE YOU THE PRO AND THE CON. THAT WAS A ONE-SIDED, SLICK MAILING. A LOT OF PEOPLE MADE-- I SHOULD SAY, A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE MADE A LOT OF MONEY PUBLICIZING A VERY HIGHLY COSTLY MAILING KIT PIECE TO MISLEAD AND NOT TO INFORM BUT TO BE IN A POSITION OF PROPAGANDA FOR A PROPOSITION THAT DIDN'T HAVE UNANIMOUS SUPPORT ON THAT BOARD. IN FACT, ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO VOTED FOR IT HAS SIGNED THE ARGUMENT AGAINST IT. IT APPEARS ON THE BALLOT. YOU HAVE THE MAYOR OF PASADENA YOU HAVE THE MAYOR OF GLENDALE. YOU HAVE SUPERVISORS KNABE, MOLINA, MYSELF OPPOSING IT. YOU HAVE A COUNCILMEMBER FROM LONG BEACH. YOU HAD, I KNOW COUNCILMEMBER HUNTER FROM POMONA HAD SIGNED A NO ARGUMENT. YOU HAD RICHARD CLOSE, LEADER OF THE SHERMAN OAKS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION IN THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY SIGNING IT. BUT YOU DIDN'T HAVE THAT PROPOSITION BEING EXPLAINED. ALL YOU HAVE IS A VERY SLICK, EXPENSIVE MAILING TO MISLEAD THE PUBLIC. AND I BELIEVE THAT IT IS A MISUSE OF FUNDS.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: I THINK WE'RE ON 95-D?


SUP. MOLINA: MISS BURKE?


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: YES.


SUP. MOLINA: I WANTED TO CLARIFY TO MR. ANTONOVICH THAT I KNOW THAT YOU DON'T THINK-- THEY TOLD ME THAT DAY THAT WHEN THE MEASURE WAS APPROVED, THEY INFORMED US THAT THEY WERE PUTTING TOGETHER THE $4.8 MILLION PUBLIC INFORMATION CAMPAIGN THAT IT CONTAINED IT. I KNOW I DIDN'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION. AND I COULDN'T FIND IT IN ANY OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT DAY. BUT THEY TOLD ME THAT THAT WAS APPROVED ON THAT DAY. I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT. YOU AND I DIDN'T SUPPORT IT. BUT THE MEMBERS THAT WERE THERE THAT DID SUPPORT IT DID APPROVE THOSE DOLLARS TO BE EXPENDED THAT DAY WE WERE TOLD AT THE LAST MEETING.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: 95-D. AND THERE IS A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC THAT HELD THAT. KAREN MORRIS. COULD YOU PLEASE COME FORWARD? PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME.


KAREN MORRIS: KAREN MORRIS.


SUP. BURKE, CHAIR: OH, I'M SORRY.


KAREN MORRIS: S.E.I.U. 721. GOOD AFTERNOON, SUPERVISORS. LET ME FIRST SAY THAT AS A MATTER OF POLICY, S.E.I.U. 721 IS ADAMANTLY AGAINST THE FURTHER PRIVATIZATION OF COUNTY PUBLIC SERVICES, INCLUDING THE PROVISION OF PRIMARY HEALTHCARE. IN RECENT YEARS, LOS ANGELES COUNTY RESIDENTS HAVE SEEN TOO MANY CLINICS, HOSPITALS AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS CLOSE. THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES'S 10 MILLION UNINSURED NEEDS MORE CARE, AN INCREASE IN THE VOLUME OF AMBULATORY CARE SERVICES AND ACCESS TO SPECIALTY CARE. WE CONCUR WITH THE COMMUNITY CLINIC ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY'S CONSULTANT FINDINGS THAT THE CURRENT SHORTAGE OF 193,560 VISITS COUNTYWIDE FOR ALL CLINIC TYPES WILL BE EXACERBATED BY THE ELIMINATION OF CAPACITY AT THE D.H.S. HEALTH CENTERS BY UNMET NEED IN GENERAL OF THE UNINSURED POPULATION AND THE PROJECTED GROWTH IN THE UNINSURED. SUPERVISORS, YOUR CONSTITUENTS DO NOT STAND TO BENEFIT FROM A PRIMARY CARE STRUCTURE THAT IS ILL DEFINED, THAT SHIFTS FROM TUESDAY BOARD MEETING TO TUESDAY BOARD MEETING. NOR DO THEY STAND TO BENEFIT FROM THE PIECEMEAL MANNER IN WHICH THE PROVISION OF AMBULATORY CARE IS BEING ADDRESSED: PRIVATIZATION HERE, EXPANSION THERE, CLOSURE HERE. WHAT THE DEPARTMENT AND THE COUNTY'S INHABITANTS NEED IS A COHESIVE AMBULATORY CARE SYSTEM AND PLAN THAT DOESN'T SHIFT THE BURDEN OF CARE, BUT BREAKS DOWN BARRIERS TO CARE, PARTICULARLY SPECIALTY CARE IN COUNTY FACILITIES, THAT ENSURES CULTURALLY COMPETENT AND LINGUISTICALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES THAT DOESN'T MERELY SWAP ONE ACCESS POINT FOR ANOTHER, THAT BUILDS UPON AND COORDINATES THE PROVISION OF QUALITY PRIMARY AND SPECIALTY CARE, CARE THAT COMES SOONER RATHER THAN LATER. YOUR CONSTITUENTS REQUIRE A PLAN THAT ENDS THAT ALL PATIENTS DISCHARGED FROM THE E.R. LEAVE, HAVING BEEN ASSIGNED A MEDICAL HOME AND WHENEVER POSSIBLE A PATHWAY TOWARDS OBTAINING ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE AS DESIGNED THROUGH THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY COVERAGE INITIATIVE. A FUNDAMENTAL FLAW IN THE PRIVATIZATION PLAN PUT FORWARD TO YOUR BOARD IS THAT THE PROP A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS TAKES PLACE AFTER RATHER THAN PRIOR TO ANY PROPOSED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. WE URGE YOU TO STEP BACK AND LOOK HARD AND FAST AT THE INTERNAL ASSUMPTIONS INFORMING THIS PROPOSAL. THE ASSUMPTIONS BEING MADE REGARDING THE PRESUMED COSTS AND THE PRESUMED BENEFITS. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON FOR THE PROPOSED PRIVATIZATION OF GLENDALE, A GEM IN A COUNTY CLINIC'S INVENTORY, TO BE PLACED BEFORE THIS BOARD AS AN URGENCY ITEM. WE MUST ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR PATIENTS AND NOT MAKE RASH DECISIONS THAT MAY BENEFIT ONE PARTICULAR CONTRACT OVER ANOTHER.

1   ...   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20

Похожие:

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconAdobe Acrobat Reader 0 Finding Words

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconAdobe Acrobat Reader 0 Finding Words

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconAdobe Acrobat Reader 0 Finding Words

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconAdobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconAdobe Acrobat Reader 0

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconAdobe Acrobat Reader

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconXp-vol + win7-旗艦版 快速安裝雙系統工程師的最愛+Adobe Acrobat X pro mac+dr eye 9 旗艦版(第三版)+PaPago 7 pc 10Q309 0即時路況導航+The Complete English Grammar Series 2009

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconЗдравствуйте, уважаемые читатели!
В данном разделе собираются книги для скачивания (взятые из сети), документы в формате pdf, для просмотра которых вам понадобится...

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconНовые поступления в Научную библиотеку пвгус в 2012 г. Вып. 3 (март)
Природопользование" [Электронный ресурс] : для студ всех спец и направл. / Поволж гос ун-т сервиса (фгбоу впо "пвгус"), Каф. "Экономика...

Adobe Acrobat Reader Finding Words iconСпециальности и направления высшего образования менеджмент организации
«Компьютерный графический дизайн (пакеты Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Photoshop, InDesign)»


Разместите кнопку на своём сайте:
lib.convdocs.org


База данных защищена авторским правом ©lib.convdocs.org 2012
обратиться к администрации
lib.convdocs.org
Главная страница